[x-pubpol] Rojadirecta: US Government Reverses Course and Returns Domains Without Explanation. Again.

[Joly MacFie]

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/08/rojadirecta-government-reverses-course-and-returns-domains-without-explanation

 BY JULIE SAMUELS

The government has decided to return two domain names it improperly seized
and held in its possession for well over a year, without so much as an
explanation. This time, it was Rojadirecta.com and
Rojadirecta.org<https://www.eff.org/cases/puerto-80-v-us>,
Puerto 80’s popular sports streaming sites, which the government seized
back in February 2011.

Following the seizure, Puerto 80 fought back, petitioning the government
for return of the domains, noting that its linking activities were not
infringing. Indeed, Puerto 80 is a Spanish company, and a Spanish court had
already found the sites legal. In a disappointing opinion, the district
court disagreed<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/08/court-refuses-give-seized-domain-name-back-claims>,
holding that the government did not have to return the domains. Puerto 80
appealed, and the case was still pending, until today, when the government
mysteriously dropped the matter.

Dropping the case was, of course, the right move. The government's
copyright arguments were incredibly weak (it’s pretty well-settled that
linking is not infringement). Even more troubling, the seizures also
captured plenty of legal and protected speech. Indeed, many (including
EFF<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/06/seized-domains-fight-back>)
have been making these arguments for well over a year. The real question is
why it took so long.

This is not the government’s first time to the rodeo. Just last December,
the government returned the improperly siezed Dajaz1.com
domain<https://www.eff.org/cases/matter-seizure-internet-domain-name-dajaz1com>
after
holding it for more than a year. (Unlike with the Rojadirecta domains, that
case was never litigated and the domain’s owner was kept in the dark about
the case against him the entire time.)

Seizing domains without legal basis and holding them for a year is a
blatant abuse of goverment power. Puerto 80’s speech was silenced for more
than 18 months. The same is true with Dajaz1 and countless other domains
that the government has seized as part of its Operation in Our Sites
program.

The government’s silent reversals have been limited to cases where the
sites’ owners fought back. This creates the troubling implication that the
reversal here is not based on a new understanding of the law and policy,
but rather an attempt to avoid a ruling from the Second Circuit that could
put an end to the government's overreaching.

The government should explain why it reversed its position, and provide a
clear policy rationale so websites around the world assess their risk for
unexplained and unjustified seizures.  Until it's clear that the government
will not continue to abuse its existing powers, it must not be granted new
IP enforcement powers<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/blacklist-bills-ripe-abuse-part-ii-expansion-government-powers>
.


More:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/government-goes-0-2-admits-defeat-in-rojadirecta-domain-forfeit-case/

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
 VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
--------------------------------------------------------------
-
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.isoc-ny.org/pipermail/x-pubpol-isoc-ny.org/attachments/20120829/071605fa/attachment-0001.htm>